Shizan says Ukrainian invasion sparked first dimensional cosmic war

Forget the TikTok wars, the concept is as hollow as the dance of Chinese social media. Ukrainian War is a beta version of Future War. This was the first armed conflict in which the structure of social networks resembling grass roots and rhizomes was transferred to the Ukrainian armed forces, where small autonomous units faced the heavy and orthodox structures of Russian tank columns.

A young professor born in 1977, director of the Center for World Policy Studies at China Foreign Affairs University, and a Chinese political scientist Shi’s definition is the first war of the Metaverse.

In an article on his WeChat page, the Chinese intellectual argued that the invasion of Ukraine opened up a new political world in which the real and digital worlds interact in a way never before seen in history, according to translations from Chinese to English. David Ownby, professor of history at the University of Montreal, sinologist.

Shi is highly regarded among European and American researchers because he was one of the first to think about China through algorithms and internet platforms, and is regarded by his American counterparts as a libertarian, that is, someone who can think under the guidance of the ubiquitous Chinese Communist Party. . In 2018, he published a Chinese history starting from a new concept, with the title already: The Hub: Three Thousand Years in China. center, or concentrator, is a device used to connect computers in a network to control traffic on various networks.China plays a similar role center According to history, in its history. He is part of a new generation of Chinese thinkers struggling to overcome the discomfort of parroting. He said Westerners were too black and white in depicting Chinese history, failing to pay attention to the shades of gray that existed between the two colors.

In the text on Ukraine, I begin with a philosophical concept. It said the war was individual, not collective, because there was social media and everyone watched the war on their phones. “This in turn changes policy”he wrote, citing the central role played by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, a 44-year-old former actor who has been using social media to seek support for his cause.

“Politics requires a good story to be told, and that story to be acted upon, and in terms of social media, Zelensky’s interactive, two-way performance in the small theater is better than Zelensky’s one-sided, focused performance. Putin on the big screen. Because when Zelensky presents his drama to the world, he turns the war into a process his fans can follow, which can be a metaphor for the virtual world.”,Say.

According to Shin, this type of interaction changes the values ​​involved in the conflict. “Many people think that the metaverse is just a gimmick, nothing more than an exhibitionist, but they don’t understand that in the Internet age, the power of this ‘exhibitionist’ is greater than our traditional imagination”, he wrote. In Shin’s text, the Metaverse is not a virtual world that the user enters and interacts with with glasses or masks. This is yet another metaphor for the image of war created by the conflict between the real world and social networks.

None of this happened by chance in Ukraine. The country takes the business created by social media so seriously that it created the Ministry of Digital Transformation before suspicions of a Russian invasion. the holder of this folder, Mikhailo Fedorov, plays a central role in digital warfare. Fedorov, 31, owns a digital marketing agency that helped elect Zelensky, the actor, successful businessman and political outsider.

The digital transformation minister was known early in the war for pressuring Facebook and Apple to keep Russia out of their networks. It was he who ran the digital campaign that elected Zelensky with about 70 percent of the vote. The tools he created to transform Ukraine into a digital nation, such as an app that centralizes personal files, are now used to obtain emergency funds and documents for those who have lost everything. He also coordinated a potentially historic campaign: documenting all of Ukraine’s losses in the war.

Applied to the world of combat, this decentralized strategy seems to explain why the Russian military seemed invincible when the war began on February 24 this year, and experienced a series of troubles. When they saw that Ukrainian troops seemed to be everywhere and had nowhere to go, they were startled and flinched.

Shin has no problem with the political component of the war, which is understandable for anyone living in a dictatorship allied with Vladimir Putin’s Russia. After exposing the networked tactics used in warfare, he said the digital component of the conflict should not be overstated.

“Online experiences can change the boundaries of behavior, but in the offline world, loopholes remain. The war is far from over, and we have to wait and see. The same thing is happening in the metaverse, where the online world redefines the offline world. “Say.

In the relationship between these two mutually constructed worlds, there will be something we don’t know what to expect, political scientists say.

Shen’s complex thinking suggests that it is a low-level judgment to classify all Chinese intellectuals as lambs of the party, as if China were a whole. I met Shin during a lecture by Daniel Aarão Reis, professor of contemporary history at UFF (Federal University of Fluminense), on the war in Ukraine. Aarão Reis is a serious intellectual: he left the PT (Partido dos Trabalhadores) in 2005 when the Mensalão scandal broke.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.